The world needs a new source of energy, an unspillable source.

Random Post

(may be broke/outdated!)

20 Responses

  1. This is my video.. not Stan Meyer. Read the comment below about the video below. The results are obtained by increasing the temp. An increase of 20 degrees will raise gas production. Try it for yourself. Has been known for many years. It is not a deception. The higher the temp the better the production. High pressure and saturation with KOH raises the boiling point.The boiling point of water can be raised to F275 degrees by 10 of 15 pounds of pressure similar to a pressure cooker.
    Aubrey Sims

  2. This is 12 volts and 12 amps max, lowest levels shown were at 1/2 amp. Anyone can replicate this. I used KOH to saturation, water time is about 140 degrees. Heating the water moves the electrons into a higher shell making the polar bonds easier to split. Try it for yourself, easily reatable even without the PWM. It is for controlling the current draw… no other reason. Water can be disassoiacated at around 2300 degrees ( if I remember correctly) with no electrical input.
    Aubrey Sims

  3. That was left from a previous experiment. I did a couple of 60 sec videos and because I was shooting it on a digital camera and that was the limit so I didn’t have time to explain a lot.

  4. If you use “line voltage” (which is alternating current), your cathode and anode will alternate (or switch places) 60 times a second, and you’ll end up getting a mixture of H2 and O at both wires, instead of having each one dedicated to one gas.

  5. Why does everybody use DC voltage for this stuff when they are collecting hydrodgen and oxygen at the same time anyways? The only reason to use DC is because one electrode makes O2 and the other H2, making it easier to collect just the hydrogen gas. It would be much simpler just to use line voltage for this than to use expensive DC power supplies which are current-limited anyways.

  6. These videos were made by a guy called Aubrey Sims, he is on the forums, do a search, and ask him. Very nice guy! Again, not Stan Meyers, nor was he using step charge methods like a cap in this video! Ask him for full details!

  7. Also, 12 volts and 12 amps would not make the noises heard in the video. At those reported numbers, no current noises would be present. How about you telling the truth about what it is you are showing.

  8. I know the author of this video, and it’s certainly not Stan Meyer… Contact me if you are interested, we are a group of people researching the Meyers patents, etc, and this is just one of the videos of some of the successes we have had in recent months…

  9. It seems great. Does anyone know the voltage on the cell? Sorry I have poor listening in English. Thanks!

  10. The voice print indicate that the voice was identical to that of a known Stan Meyer sample.

  11. I would disagree this videos author has more of a southern accent than Stanley Meyer.

  12. I did a voice print on this one and I am almost certain that it is Stan Meyer’s voice, although on a discussion group on yahoo someone else claimed it as his.

  13. Unknown, I uploaded the video from Google video to see if anybody had any information or comments.

  14. hi!
    looks interesting, a huge amount of gas for only two tubes.
    are u using an ELECTROLYTE, or is that just plain tap water?

Efficient Water Electrolysis For Hydrogen Production. 2/2


Google Videos- Author unknown. I DID NOT MAKE THIS VIDEO. Experiments with efficient electrolysis, using a 2 inch outer tube and 1 1/2 inner. I found this video on Google Videos and uploaded it here to YouTube. I knew immediately that this video needed to be promoted to as many people worldwide as possible to help validate the hydrogen from water movement. The technology has been kept hidden from us for hundreds of years. Mythbusters did a segment building an Oxyhydrogen generator using electrolysis, the design plans they used and technology was over 100 years old, and was something you’d expect a 8 year old kid to build. They did not use a system like the author here in this video, I’m quite sure had they followed this authors design their results would have been vastly different. Here is the link for the other video- www.youtube.com