25 Responses

1. lets hear the sound of the engine instead

2. make a decent video u fuckin punk

3. I invented a breakthrough source of energy that contradicts the law of conservation of energy. I have a PROOF that there are electrodynamic phenomena that contradict the law of conservation of energy. I am looking for $6M for a prototype and patents.
   H. Tomasz Grzybowski
   tel. +48-512-933-540

4. what i mean is that 10 watts of mechanical power might turn into 9 watts of electricity which produces maybe 5 watts of combustible hydrogen due to energy losses in conversion .. so if you put those 5 watts of combustible hydrogen back into the engine you’ve effectively lost 5 watts .. therefore somewhere in the cycle the hydrogen must increase the efficiency to counter the losses .. my questions is where?

5. In a combustion engine you need an explosion to push the pistons to create movement. Hydrogen is many times/ at least 4 times more explosive than gasoline…………..

6. im still trying to understand how it saves fuel .. is it because the hydrogen burns hotter in the engine and allows for more complete combustion of the original fuel?

7. @eyegoldeneye,,,,I didn’t read back on this whole discourse about using more energy than you make, but with regard to using hyroxy in an engine, isn’t a lot of your net benifit from making the diesel fuel burn more efficiently? If that is the case, I don’t get the confusion about why the truck ran better.

8. jnhn

9. You resort to swearing which in itself proves you’re an idiot. But aside, your posts prove that you honestly don’t have a clue how any of this works and thus should continue breathing that agonizing air your country is known for. Hicks screwing around in their garage’s have produced more advancements than any scientist.

10. I love saying this….So What! It’s about cutting into big oil..Eventually we’ll get off it all together.. wait we can! McDonalds! It’s a diesel truck, run it on free deep-fryer oil. That people actually get paid to dispose of!

11. @acidDiesel -so you’re saying- use a 50cc engine to spin a generator that makes hydrogen. Then pump that hydrogen into the main engine to help it with fuel economy? right? Well, I’m saying- since making and burning hydrogen is such an energy LOSER, you are better off just burning the gasoline in the main engine and not messing with all that b.s., because it doesnt add energy to the car, it takes energy away from the car.

12. ….i didn’t say run the hole thing off the 50cc……. its only 2 pick up the slack..

13. A 50cc engine wont make enough HHO to fuel the engine of a garbage truck. In fact, it wont even make enough HH0 to power itself. That’s the fallacy of these ‘run your car on water’ scams. You are not making a fuel that contains more energy than it took to make. That’s why it’s a scam. The claims are false. I wish people would stop perpetuating this myth and focus on something with real potential, like better batteries and fusion power.

14. all this in mined turn the fuel pump off 2 the engine. but put a small 50cc or 100cc gas generator in the car 2 help with the power not 2 generate all of or it but the little more u will need .. but because your helping the alternator generate power (and u have enuf perdition 2 run a 6cylander) then that will move the car.. then what little gas the little generator will use in comparison 2 the v6(if that’s what in the car) will be greatly improved…(what i think would be the best outcome)

15. Try shutting off your fuel pump and see what happens. The engine will stop. You cannot run an engine, any engine, of the electrolysis that it’s powering. Even if you acheived 100% efficiency in your electrolysis, it doesnt matter. You still have losses in the alternator and the engine.. even if you got those to 100% (impossible), you would have a net-energy of exactly ZERO.. which means there’s no energy to move the vehicle. You have to make the hydrgoen with some other source of energy.

16. I just ignored your rubbish talk, and this is what spurred me into asking about the dating of your education.

    There is only so much room for comments, and I prefer to get to the ultimate points, rather than inform you on the difference between a T-delta and T-max. You simply don’t seem dumb enough to need the help :-)

    I argue to the overriding conflict, hence why I quote efficiency for an in-place reactor.

    I need not prove myself, the technology exists and is already in use in numerous labs.

17. Yes, I’ve been to Lichtenstein. Stayed for a few days in Vaduz in September or October of 2000.

    I paid $80/night in a nice hotel with a very nice view.

    I had breakfast and walked to Franz Josef’s castle.

    No visitors :-(

    My travels:

    USA (28 states), Mexico, Netherlands + Antilles, England, Belgium, France, Germany, Poland, Czech, Italy, Austria, Switzerland ( to the Jung Frau Hoc & the top of Europe :-) ), etc…

    14 countries in total. I remained in Europe for two months. “I’m traveled.”

18. Hahahahahahhahahahahhaha, hey you shithead, the last two comments I wrote were completely pseudo-scientific rubbish with no sense at all, but you do as if I said sth intelligent. No wonder that one can post a video, talk utter nonsense and find enough stupid shitheads like you who take everything as reliable, without questioning it, well with the little brain you have. And I certainly do not think that a monkey like you is a genius. Quite the opposite.

19. Technically speaking, I am a certified genius, yes. But that doesn’t mean anything what-so-ever.

    IQ != Knowledge.

    BTW, your missing the critical mechanical portion of your thought experiment.

    When you apply pressure and elongate the molecule, you increase the likelihood of interfering with the H2=O bond.

    Ionized hydrogen occurs mechanically, but is almost an undesired effect.

    Of every H20 molecule, half will be split, and half of those will be usable for fuel.

    More or less – it is theory.

20. How dated is your education?

    There is a difference between solid science and theoretical science.

    I am speaking of the latter where we can manufacture nan-scale devices small enough that a single hydrogen atom can mechanically forced through a tube at 100 bar or so ( if that is even needed ), and the remaining oxygen atoms can be vented through a larger tunnel.

    It is an atom sorter, using an electrical current to interrupt bonds just enough to make mechanical separation feasible.

    From 1940s.

21. And you really should consider that interference with the valence bond results in a negative spin of the other atoms and makes the reversion of the magnetization of the hydrogen atom obsolete. Then it doesn’t even make a sense to downscale the process and split the sub-atomic particles of the molecules into a new configuration so that the energy level of them increase by 13.34 % at a temperature of T=-14.23 degree celsius and a pressure of p=1.34 bar. Did you consider this in your experiment?

22. Ah really, you must be a genius? But did you consider that while scaling it down and squezing it down the electron valence bond is electro-magnetically strengthened and tends to split in halves the compound derivatives with the opposite impulse of the Pauli spin? Then, the second orbital prevents the emission of a photon-electrical energy that makes it impossible to split the atoms from the molecule? Did you put this into your equation as well? And what do you think about the H2 impulse?

23. Really? That’s what current science shows? Well, science and you are two things that are diametrically opposed. (If you shouldn’t know what diametrical means, well, it just that science and you, simply don’t fit to each other).

24. Let’s start with a first question: Do you even know where my country is? Can you even find Europe on the map? This would be the first difficult task for a Billy Bob like you.

    And another task for you: name at least 5 European countries with their capitals. (I guess this one will be too difficult but give it a try!).

25. Have you ever been to the US OF A?

    I’ve been to your land. It was pretty, but stank to high heaven.

    Everyone seemed to have the same crappy odor.

    I guess that is what happens when y’all keep your heads in each others’ asses all the time in fear of new thought.

    Hell, current science shows very clearly that what I am talking about works.

    It is the premise of the hydrogen fuel cell. Only in reverse.

    Why don’t you look around and see all the experiments that have performed?

    Make your own!