Do you think that Judge Martin Feldman makes a logical argument when comparing BP oil spill w/ Exxon Valdez?

Question by Dead Parrot Society☮: Do you think that Judge Martin Feldman makes a logical argument when comparing BP oil spill w/ Exxon Valdez?
He said:

“If some drilling equipment parts are flawed, is it rational to say all are?” he asked. “Are all airplanes a danger because one was? All oil tankers like Exxon Valdez? All trains? All mines? That sort of thinking seems heavy-handed, and rather overbearing.”

This doesn’t make sense to me. All of these situations don’t acknowledge the possibility of another occurrence, and the Exxon Valdez was caused by a drunk captain.

Just curious from a legal standpoint.

Thanks.
Wow, Abbs, I never thought of that! Too funny.

Best answer:

Answer by Abby Normal
Was that Martin or Marty?

What do you think? Answer below!