The world needs a new source of energy, an unspillable source.

What is more likely: That various governments paid off 97% of climatologists to say global warming is man-made?

Question by Gods bless the USA A.R.T.: What is more likely: That various governments paid off 97% of climatologists to say global warming is man-made?
Or that oil companies paid off 3% to say it isn’t?

Who has more to make from this deal? A government who could possibly gain a slight economic advantage by creating jobs in alternative energy or whatever? Or an oil company which stands to lose tens of billions of dollars because usage of their product is literally making the globe unsafe for humans to live on?

And if government were indeed paying off scientists, it would be a worldwide conspiracy. Only a handful of climate scientists reject global warming, there are tens of thousands of climate scientists around the globe who all agree it is indeed being accelerated by man’s actions. Do people really think a conspiracy theory with tens of thousands of people involved is possible to maintain?

Best answer:

Answer by Duke
Lol, people still believe in man made global warming.

What do you think? Answer below!