Former Area 51 employee Bob Lazar is interviewed by Visual Effects Supervisor Jon Farhat. In this video, they discuss what H1 (hydrogen) is, how it is created and it’s potential in the automotive sector. In addition, Bob show us he has his own particle accelerator which he uses to create 6Li (lithium-6) H (hydride) for H1 storage.
6Li is used to store hydrogen safely and efficiently. It is also one of the key components in making a thermal-nuclear weapon, but by itself is not dangerous. Because of crony capitalism and ignorant politicians, the US government has banned 6Li and the buying and selling of it. However, the making of 6Li H yourself with your own particle accelerator IS NOT!
Bob uses solar panels to power an H1 generator which produces H1 from H2O (water). For the safe and efficient storage of the dangerous H1, 6Li H must be created with a particle accelerator and used for H1 storage in high compression tanks. With the H1 generator, H1 is forced into the 6Li H tanks through the syringe compression process.
Bob is the owner of of United Nuclear Scientific and Switch2Hydrogen. Jon is the owner of ODEMAX and director of this video.
* Engineers and scientists, send errata my way and I will fix it.
25 Responses
The thing to remember about Bob Lazar, is that he’s been involved in
“conspiracies” and “government cover ups” for a long time. He is very
intelligent and very convincing to those who are not used to listening to
intelligent hoaxers.
Did anyone notice that we never saw the car run or any of the real inner
workings? All we saw were some tanks in the back of a car with some hoses
and wires. Then we were shown a simple college experiment producing
hydrogen from water. Finally we are shown a particle accelerator. But
really, all we see are props and nothing actually working. This has been
the history of “alternative energy” for decades.
Yes, much of what he says about big business and government interference is
probably true, but that’s just a smoke screen to prevent someone from
trying to reproduce his device and testing it for themselves. If you can’t
buy all the materials, and it takes a “genius” to make them, no “common”
person will try and any chemist or physicist who knows better won’t be
bothered with it. But, in the meantime, he gets more media attention which
seems to be what he is really after.
In my time I’ve known three separate individuals just like him. Very
intelligent, but not content to just be themselves. They must be noticed in
some way by everyone and they will out and out lie to do it. Any type of
media attention will fit the bill. I know of three separate attempts he’s
made: UFO’s at Area 51, selling rare chemicals and materials to high
schools, and now this. Maybe there’s something to converting cars to
hydrogen, but it’s not going to come from Bob Lazar; He never “produces”
anything.
I don’t think you’re supposed to burn the hydrogen. You’re supposed to
force the electron out of the hydrogen and recombine it with Oxygen to form
water. Then use the electricity to power your car.
This video demonstrates hydrogen production from water, explains hydrides
(a storage medium in the tanks), shows a cool hydrogen car (Corvette), and
explains why the best hydride is banned —no good reason.
Hydrogen is not expensive to make. It’s very easy to make it, and you can
use solar panels to keep the cost down. It’s almost a free energy.
So you asking…Why not just charge the batteries in an electric car,
instead of converting it to hydrogen? The battery pack in my Honda Hybrid
costs $5000.00 and if I am lucky it will last 4 to 5 years. My last battery
pack lasted 2 1/2 years, but it was still under warranty and they replaced
it for free. To make my hybrid totally electric I would need to double my
battery pack. Now the only issue with hydrogen is that your tank has be to
4 times the size of your gasoline tank and about 20 times heavier. Also In
the gas state it’s very explosive. But there are several alternatives to
making it store in a lighter tank and he is showing you one way to do so.
However you can’t buy the material for home use and I don’t own a particle
accelerator.
That hydrogen generator he showed was at least $5000. This is the thing
that I find interesting, because I would love to be able to store hydrogen
like a battery. They showed how easy it is to make hydrogen, and I
understand that you have to make sure that it is oxygen/moisture free. But
the tech to make it is so simple, and yet ridiculously expensive. The
closest thing I’ve found is these guys
http://www.jdcproducts.com/products.html but they don’t have anything for
refining or storage. If anybody knows more about this I’d love to hear.
This is utterly hilarious… I mean the laws and regulations and so on.
But not those form the problem. It’s us.
Not the US. Us, the inhabitants of the blue marble.
We choose to be sheep and follow the sheppards… happily grazing the malls.
Meanwhile, lithium rechargeable batteries are at the point where they can
provide acceptable mileage for a normal car, good milage for a light,
composite and aluminum-made vehicle and even some real air-time.

This video demonstrates hydrogen production from water, explains hydrides
(a storage medium in the tanks), shows a cool hydrogen car (Corvette), and
explains why the best hydride is banned —no good reason.
Wait Wait Wait so his combustion engine runs of burning hydrogen? Seems
like that would be a pretty massive conversion. 
Why arnt we funding this ? !!!!
This video demonstrates hydrogen production from water, explains hydrides
(a storage medium in the tanks), shows a cool hydrogen car (Corvette), and
explains why the best hydride is banned —no good reason.
The proper Stan Meyer Replicated systems.
http://www.stanmeyerreplications.net
Wow hydrogen is better than I thought..
Looks to me like a “Visual Effects” film with miss-information to the max.
It is sad to see some one waste time and skills on a video that does not
help educate folks for renewable and alternative energy systems.
I recommend a basic online course in physics or renewable energy to un-do
the poor science in this video. Look on Wiki for good information! A great
book to start with is “Reinventing Fire” by RMI. It has many innovative
outside of the box ideas presented in an educational/basic format for the
average reader. It is one of the only books out there with real solutions
available now.
Here are some facts to start with:
This appears to be an ICE (internal combustion engine) which still loses
about 75-80% of any fuel energy into heat. An electric car loses about 10%
of energy to heat. So that is about 20% efficiency for the ICE and 90% for
the EV (electric motor).That is why the Leaf EV gets a 129MPG rating and
the corvette is more near 20MPG.
Solar PV and Wind energy is NOT free! They are around 3 to 10 cents per kWh
over the life of the system. EVs like the Leaf get about 4 miles per kWh
and cost 1 to 2 cents per mile from cheap wind or solar PV. Solar PV,
Wind, and “Particle Accelerators” all require “embedded energy” to
manufacture/operate. They also have toxic waste by-products so you do not
really want to think of them as free even if they are much better than oil
products.
If you produce hydrogen with your own PV system at your home then you might
get 50 to 60% of energy into the hydrogen production. Then you lose 80% in
the ICE so you are at about 10% of the original energy! This means say 6
cents / 10% efficiency or 60 cents per kWh of energy out of the engine. My
expensive electricity from PG&E is about 33 cents/kwh. This gives the car
in this video about a 10MPG rating vs 129MPG for the EV.
One great advantage of the hydrogen modified ICE is that it is very clean
running! This is super important when you replace an even more dirty
engine (2 cycle ICE) on an old lawn mower. I have seen crazy numbers on
this type of pollution device in the order of 50 times worse than a newer
ICE car. There are many “AIR Pollution Control Authorities” that offer
subsidized electric mowers to reduce this. Getting rid of my lawn , if I
had one ;-) , could actually be equivalent of 2 years of driving a
car(22,000 miles per SCAQMD near LA Ca.). Then you can also not waste 50%
of the water to pollute 50 times as much!
An application where you are recovering wasted electricity like on a
off-grid hydro or off-grid PV and using the extra generation for producing
hydrogen makes a lot of since. It is a way to store clean energy even if
it is not so efficient (50-80%).
Another important energy fact is that energy consumed in
delivery/processing of electricity and crude oil.
It takes about 1/2 the energy in both cases to transform and delivery
energy to your house via long distance high voltage lines and gasoline to
the gas station from an oil well. This is where on site solar PV grid tied
electricity has a huge advantage.
If you want to get the plans
to convert your car to HHO
Go to Google and Search for:
*”Top HHO Gas Car Research”*
Click the First Result (Skip the Advertisement)
A tank of gas isn’t explosive in itself even in a accident as only gas
fumes are explosive
Main problem is making a tank to store hydrogen on a hydrogen car that wont
make the car a bomb in a accident or if the connections malfunction
Hydrogen on demand from water is a safe way to store the fuel but water
will become a taxed and regulated resource if it comes the main way cars
work with “big oil” becoming “Big Water” and cars,trucks and planes
competing with people for water
At 9.33 the gas escapes upwards to the sky, it does not linger like propane
or gasoline vapour. 
Dear viewers. Please understand that the whole trick is about efficiency.
They do not speak about how much hydrogen they get from 1 kWh of
electricity. And there is a reason. Also don’t suppose that “efficiency can
go up”. It can but only a little bit. In conclusion. Hydrogen is not “cheap
way” to store energy. If that would be the case military would use that for
decades. Going from 10 bucks for 100 miles down to 8 bucks for 100 miles is
pointless. Electricity is about 1$ for 100 miles. Yes battery is expensive
but also is hydrogen vehicle and fuel cells. It will not pay off :(
This video demonstrates hydrogen production from water, explains hydrides
(a storage medium in the tanks), shows a cool hydrogen car (Corvette), and
explains why the best hydride is banned —no good reason.
there is a new method to make hydrogen from water with terahertz radiation
developed by prof. guo at university of michigan
http://youtu.be/x5jOwslnhZs
Hydrogen Car is the very good idea world must direct aim to reduce gasoline
oil and realize the energy pollusion.
What ‘s the radiation detection for? Is x-ray radiation potentially emitted
from the Lithium during the hydrogen fuel process, or during the lithium
hydride process?
here he is using the hidrogen as an energy combustion source. But we just
get a 25% of the energy in the hydrogen doing this (as any other fuel), but
if we use a fuel cell, we can have 40%-60% of efficiency without the need
of those rare materials.. I am right?
We just need to change our combustion engine by an electric motor (which
they have 95% of efficiency) and you can regenerate the brake energy in few
capacitors.
This video contains some real science but also a lot of misleading science.
First I want to point out that lithium hydride is highly reactive
especially towards water and him saying that nothing will happen even if
you puncture the tanks is simply not true. Secondly if lithium6 can do it
lithium 7 the more abundant isotope can also achieve the same purpose. In
the case with lithium 7 more heat may be require to liberate the hydrogen
from the solid as larger mass isotopes tends to form stronger bonds
(kinetic isotope effect). my background : MSci Chemistry
If one were to hook an electrolysis type hydrogen gas generator, capable of
efficiently utilizing a full megawatt, sitting just a few feet away from an
ocean current powered, one megawatt DC turbine generator, one would produce
more hydrogen gas energy then a fracked natural gas well on a dollar spent
per dollars returned basis. Just one such hydrogen generator per square
mile for the outer 5 miles to the international water line around the
entire US would create over 35000 generators producing enough hydrogen gas
energy to replace all the combined gasoline, diesel, propane, coal, and
nuclear energy used in this country. (talk about a megacorp!) The hydrogen
gas would be pumped on shore, dried, then pumped into the 1.5 million miles
of pipelines Mike is talking about without any further processing or ever
worrying about the gas going bad. Converting houses and industries over to
use the natural hydrogen gas versus the natural fossil gas could produce a
job producing industry by itself. Coal fired plants need simply put a large
efficient hydrogen gas burner inside their coal burner and then do away
with the coal. Nuclear plants could do something similar. No need to
rebuild the electrical grid, everyone would start running off the hydrogen
gas flowing through the gas lines whether they use a fuel cell or a small
piston engine that operates a generator. No more power lines, no more power
outages due to bad weather. The government could do this for us just like
they built the Hoover dam which brought the southwest to life if we could
just grow up again and realize that not all taxes are bad.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZHWAKseqkYE
http://www.hydrogenfuelsystems.com.au/
Save 30% to 50 % fuel costs and increase Power 25% using Patented Hydrogen
generation system designed by Hydrogen Fuel Systems Pty Ltd – Perth West
Australia.
Looking for agents to earn excellent commissions distributing these hho
systems