The world needs a new source of energy, an unspillable source.


The original video: www.youtube.com The image of the comment: holysmoke.org

25 Responses

  1. @Desertphile OK but how many of these laws are you aware of…. how many dimensions are there in the universe? Can we transcend the speed of light? Or overcome Gravity? Is the world still flat? Pull your hat down a bit further that is thstoopid!

  2. @MattBlytheTheOne Trying to violate the laws the govern the universe is a waste of time, and stupid.

  3. @fullmontycarlo so the theory goes! It is not a waste of time if you have knowledge and belief that challenges the conventional wisdom… indeed you would be wasting your time NOT researching your theories!

  4. The amount of energy required to create oxyhydrogen is greater than the energy released when you combust it. Why would you waste you time?

  5. I know lots of people who return 50% (or less) of what’s put into them… Some of them I’ve had the pleasure of working with. Others, working for. ;)

  6. …he developed systems for Fighter Jets, rockets, home heating systems, automobiles, he was able to “dope” hydrogen by recycling its own inert exhaust gases to get it to burn like almost any other cumbustible fuel, natural gas, petroleum, diesal, etc..etc.. it wasn’t “just” electrolysis his technology was somewhat advanced…

  7. Having 26 US patents is equal to watching 26 of EletrikRides videos.
    Add them together and you have 52 pieces of Bullshit.

    Stanley Meyer was a fraud. I thought everyone knew that. But I guess your
    one of the last to learn.

  8. … electrolysis was only part of the process, he also had pulsed laser particle excitor technology that fractured the water molecule for a fraction of the energy required during electrolyisis, and an injector for the internal combustion engine, his electrolysis model was generally only used for demonstration purposes. He was granted no less than 26 US patents for utilising his hydrogen technologies… quite a lot of reading to debunk if you are not a nuclear physicist!

  9. That is the wiki version, written by somone with a vested interest no doubt. Stan’s work included Hean monitors for the medical profession, the Validator System for the banking institution, The NIVAX and ACTAR systems for the oceanography field, the EBED concept for Star Wars to name a few. Unsurprisingly none of those were found fraudulant! He wasn’t just a farmer as he is depicted. His patents are quite comprehensive.

  10. MattBlytheTheOne, you should have read a little further, Stanley Meyer was a fraud.

    His “water fuel cell” was later examined by three witnesses in court who found that there “was nothing revolutionary about the cell at all and that it was simply using conventional electrolysis”. The court found Meyer guilty of “gross and egregious fraud” and ordered him to repay the two investors their $25,000

  11. Look up Stanley Meyer he ran his dune buggy for 100 miles on 4oz of water…. read the patents if you havn’t already.

  12. Please look up “exothermic” and “endothermic.” You are talking “apples and oranges” here.

  13. how very small minded of you! there is more atomic energy in water than several thousand barrels of oil and the by product is water! go figure…

  14. It is none of your business whom I work for, so fuck off and die.

    Oxyhydrogen needlessly wastes energy and pollutes the environment; it is asinine and socially repugnant to promote oxyhydrogen as an “alternative fuel” when all it does is act as a very inefficient transport of energy.

  15. No, oxyhydrogen is not a “fake:” claims of these worthless devices increasing MPG are fake. I.e., lies. Step forward with evidence showing otherwise.

  16. 9 out 10 people who claim it works is selling them. There are many reasons you may be seeing mpg gains, the biggest is you have changed your driving habits, whether you admit it or not. There is a mentality among believers of anything. It makes no matter what the belief is, there is a type of “religious’ zealousy. Should we take your claims on “faith” that it works for you? I think not.

  17. I love all the skeptics! They make me laugh! They talk so much about how HHO, or what ever it’s really called, is fake. Meanwhile, thousands and thousands are enjoying working systems. Despite all the science that says HHO doesn’t work, why are people still enjoying real results? That’s the question that nobody seems to be asking. I know it’s not magic. Can someone explain why I was able to make a working dry cell?

  18. “who”? I never was that must have come from your mind! Is that an Acubra by the way?

  19. “At the moment there is no such method. Also, it is utterly useless because there is no infrastructure for it, no use, and no market. ”

    I cannot believe an educated person just said that? Who do YOU work for… and how do you pay your bills?

  20. Later in the exact same comments section I read this from “thesecretcollection’,

    “THUMP!

    You hear that?

    that’s the sound of OPEC crapping out a huge brick of panic……”

    Yep! They’ve got OPEC on the run alright.

    Palm……….face…………..etc…….