25 Responses

1. I may have described it wrong. So with this Stanley Meyer pulse setup your current source will draw a specific amount of amps as input into the circuit. This current will be applied in the pulse pattern tot he WFC.
   But what would happen if you just used DC connected to the WFC and adjusted the current to match the current of the input with the Meyer circuit?
   Would the production be less, more, or the same?

2. no. the current is cut because the on time is cut. the inductor absorbs the pulses

3. the same current with pure DC.

4. more then what?

5. so is there more production with this circuit? did you measure it?

6. resonance is a funny word. most think it means magic.
   i think you are looking for that magic. this is not just electrolysis
   there is no electrolyte in the water
   and before you say it, it will work in distilled water.
   this circuit does what is is meant to do by the man that designed it

7. Resonance key to many advanced energy techs.
   Strength in numbers. As many as possible need to start producing, selling, and installing these types of Alt Energy devices that REALLY work! Document & Disseminate the legit info. NO RIPOFFS!
   Eventually the tide does and WILL build. They can only ‘control’ a very small amount of the ocean. But not a tidal wave nor a tsunami. Everyone build on that and start the tide swell.

8. I’ve looked a quite a bit of this stuff here and think that think that there ARE legitimate possibilities. But this is just well known electrolysis unit.
   Long time ago read confirmation from Lawrence Livermore National laboratories confirming reduced pollution & increased energy output above that of just the HHO input. It seems to act as some sort of catalyst which falls within laws of physics.
   Read # of indep. Lab reports from early product documenting improvements.
   Start making and selling!

9. there is a simple proof. catilytic converters on the cars
   not needed and the car is programed to use more fuel

10. The information is out – the press release. The reporting exists only in science blogs and journals. Here is what a journalist wrote to me this morning…

    “But there simply isn’t enough evidence available to prove your main thesis: that Goodrich is involved in a conspiracy to suppress clean energy technology based on a conversation you had with a company executive that he denies ever took place. ”

    Apparently – I’m not supposed to exist and my personal confessions are meaningless.

11. its all a sham man. government and judges
    con men all

12. Put “Judge keeps letters in MCSi case secret” Dayton Daily News

    November 23, 2011

    Yes, my letter is one of the Secret letters.

13. you need to focus on the poisoning of our water and food and air
    we all know they are doing it
    do you really think they will let the info out , when you do what your going to do?
    it will not even make the news papers

14. Not that it matters, but the CEO’s company went bankrupt in 2003, not 2008. I mistyped. The sentencing hearing was 10/24/2011.

    The Judge already had my written statement well in advance of the sentencing hearing.

15. On October 24, 2011 I was scheduled to offer my testimony as a victim of a financial crime during the sentencing hearing of a CEO whose company went bankrupt in 2008.

    I was detained by an armed DOJ representative in the witness waiting room while an imposter was permitted to speak in my place.

    It may not a coincidence that the DOJ Anti-trust letter opportunity expires at the same time the exclusive field of use license expires. My letter is going to focus on concerns about National Security.

16. i have seen the voinivich letters. we all know the government is a pack of dogs pissing on the people. do you have any videos showing this? is there really anything we can do? you vote for one crook to go to office or another crook. you hire the best crook for the job and there they are president. what can we do?

17. No – I have not seen any of this stuff pouring out hydrogen, but am in currently in contact with the USDOE Technology Transfer Office attempting to offer an alternative to the existing EXCLUSIVE arrangement.

    I can only discuss my experiences – like being constructively terminated by Goodrich Corporation less than a year after I received the letters from Senator Voinovich and the USDOE back in September 2006..

18. ic
    so you ever see any of this stuff pouring out hydrogen? in person i mean

19. United Technologies Corp and Goodrich Corp may be attempting to create a monopoly around this technology right now. The USDOE “Exclusive Field of Use” license expires at the end of September – along with the public’s right to know.

20. push. pickensplan. com / forum / topics/ 2187034:Topic:17420

    My first public disclosure July 8, 2008

21. Put “Joe Jefferis Whistleblower” into your search engine:

    Or “Joe Jefferis American Patriot”

    Or “Joe Jefferis Short Sale Disclosure

    Be sure to read the documents attached at the bottom of the SEC Public Comment pages.

    My experiences are not a secret – just taboo.

    Any person may submit written comments by 09/21/12 to Maribeth Petrizzi, Chief,
    Litigation II Section, Antitrust Division, U.S. Department of Justice,
    450 Fifth Street, N.W., Suite 8700, Washington, D.C. 20530.

22. well……
    YEAH!
    talk man talk
    you want my email or you want to say it here?

23. Having played a direct role in the effort to suppress this technology while employed by Goodrich Corporation from 2003-2007, I have a unique perspective.

    Would you like to learn more about what is going on now?

24. right
    the government has been researching this for a long time. i would like to know what they are not telling us

25. Put “say hello to cheap hydrogen” into your search engine.