How are they similar and different? Which one cause more damage?
(may be broke/outdated!)
How are they similar and different? Which one cause more damage?
Unspillable.com is your gateway into to the intriguing world of energy mysteries, revolutionary fuels, and the science driving alternative energy solutions. Delve into the depths of covert agendas and unexplained phenomena surrounding energy sources while uncovering the latest advancements in renewable technologies. From debunking conspiracies to exploring the cutting edge of sustainable energy, we’re your go-to resource for unraveling the secrets shaping our energy landscape.
© 2024 All Rights Reserved
3 Responses
Well they both involved crude oil. But one came from a ship so the amount of oil was very limited the other is coming from a well so the supply of oil is far greater. The crude in Alaska was thicker and in colder water so it didn’t break up very fast but the BP oil is thinner and in warmer so it breaks up quicker which makes it harder to skim off.
BP oil spill will have worse effect on environment.
Exxon’s was from a ship loaded with Crude oil and the exact amount was know. It was easier to contain it. But BP’s is from a existing well and it took more than 60 days to stop it and the exact amount is still a case being debated. So in amount wise BP’s is more than Exxon’s. The Exxon spill did not drift to far causing wide spread damage to environment. But BP’s due to the nature of the wave pattern, climate etc has spread to a great extend affecting a lot of communities.