The world needs a new source of energy, an unspillable source.

Random Post

(may be broke/outdated!)

9 Responses

  1. Go to the real resource and take the time to read the 9/11 Commission’s report. You will not be saying stuff like this after you actually read the facts.

  2. Oh God, I thought the rubber room folks caught all of you. There is no evidence for anything but a terrorist attack as we all know occurred. Go find a life will you please and stop annoying the adults with that looniness.

  3. Assuming your premise is true (and as yet I have seen no proof of conspiracy on the part of our leaders – just incompetence) people will seldom raise up aginst thier government. Example from the 20th century are Hitler and Nazi Germany (millions killed), Stalin and the Soviet Gulags (hundredsof thousands detained,tortured,and murdered) , Roosevelt and allowing the Japanese to bomb Pearl Harbor (done for economic reasons – the war not The New Deal brought the US out of the depression), Kennedt and Daley commandeering the 1960 election.

  4. The “evidence” you speak of is not evidence. It is supposition and opinion. Even after numerous offerings of investigation by credible and trustworthy sources, the theorists dismiss them out of hand, many times refusing to examine the sources findings.

    I have looked at each and every source of “evidence” presented by those who claim 9/11 an inside job yet not one person who has sent me foul, nasty, name-calling email will admit they have ever looked at the credible information available.

    Why? I think it is because the credible facts presented blow the fantastic theories completely out of the water. The theorists leadership have all been on the fringe for years, Jeff Rense and the like have agendas that do not relate to their wild claims. Most of them are making a profit from misleading people.

  5. I wonder if the terrorists had anything to do with it. Oh that’s right, everything is about oil. Sorry but not everything happens because of oil. I think there is a conspiracy convention and I think they meet every year on the moon.

  6. Well, as far as I’m concerned, its still all just a wacko-theory. I haven’t seen a SINGLE bit of “evidence” yet.

    I won’t rant any further.

  7. You must be visiting sites run by kooks.

    More and more evidence prove that 9/11 was initiated and done by muslim extremist who wanted to weaken our nation both emmotionally and financially.

    Please do at least an iota of research before parroting the same bull from sites run my questionable people with a hatred for America. Yes, they hate america.

    Debunking Sites:
    http://911conspiracysmasher.blogspot.com/
    http://www.911myths.com/
    http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/research/4199607.html
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/158816635X/sr=8-1/qid=1155609077/ref=sr_1_1/104-6098036-7150331?ie=UTF8
    http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/09/19/032851.php
    http://www.slate.com/id/1008297/
    http://www.debunk911myths.org/
    http://www.debunking911.com/
    http://www.jod911.com/
    http://southerncrossreview.org/41/9-11.htm
    http://www.lists.opn.org/pipermail/org.opn.lists.skeptix/Week-of-Mon-20060911/003261.html
    http://www.politicalhobbyist.com/debunked/alexjones.html
    http://www.lolinfowars.co.nr/
    http://www.jnani.org/mrking/writings/911/king911.htm
    http://gradeonegadfly.blogspot.com/2006/10/loose-change-on-upper-east-side-part-i.html
    http://www.911cultwatch.org.uk/
    http://www.infoshop.org/texts/debunking911.html
    http://internetdetectives.biz/case/loose-change
    http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs_8_2006.htm
    http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5782277
    http://www.uwgb.edu/dutchs/PSEUDOSC/911NutPhysics.HTM
    http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html
    http://screwloosechange.blogspot.com/
    http://antitruther.blogspot.com/
    http://thedoc911.blogspot.com/
    http://www.iht.com/bin/print_ipub.php?file=/articles/2006/09/01/news/conspiracy.php

    Reports:
    http://wtc.nist.gov/
    http://www.house.gov/science/hot/wtc/wtcreport.htm
    http://www.gpoaccess.gov/911/
    http://www.9-11commission.gov/
    http://www.house.gov/science/hot/wtc/wtc-report/WTC_ch2.pdf
    http://www-math.mit.edu/~bazant/WTC/WTC-asce.pdf
    http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2001/09/12/victim-capsule-flight77.htm
    http://www.berkeleydailyplanet.com/article.cfm?archiveDate=10-07-01&storyID=7299
    http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/nyregion/20050812_WTC_GRAPHIC/9110285.PDF
    http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/conspiracy/q0265.shtml
    http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/conspiracy/q0274.shtml
    http://www.asce.org/responds/
    http://www.asce.org/pressroom/news/display_press.cfm?uid=1057
    http://www.implosionworld.com/Article-WTC%20STUDY%208-06%20w%20clarif%20as%20of%209-8-06%20.pdf
    http://www.ce.berkeley.edu/~astaneh/1-Services/Astaneh-Testimony%20Congress-March%206%20Final.pdf
    http://911research.wtc7.net/cache/planes/defense/aviationnow_jumpstart.htm
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/3919613.stm
    http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/02/25/attack/main501989.shtml
    http://www.designnews.com/index.asp?layout=article&articleid=CA6363426&industryid=43653
    http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB196/doc04.pdf
    http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB196/doc08.pdf
    http://s3.amazonaws.com/911timeline/2001/embryriddle092101.html
    http://www.epa.gov/WTC/demolish_deconstruct/30wbroadway.htm
    http://www.post-gazette.com/headlines/20010925scene0925p2.asp
    http://www.firehouse.com/news/2002/7/7_P911.html
    http://www.firehouse.com/terrorist/11_APdc.html
    http://www.firehouse.com/terrorist/911/magazine/gz/norman.html
    http://www.firehouse.com/terrorist/911/magazine/gz/boyle.html
    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A28318-2005Apr5.html
    http://www.post-gazette.com/headlines/20011220shanksville1220p2.asp
    http://www.post-gazette.com/headlines/20010925sledzik0925p3.asp
    http://www.post-gazette.com/headlines/20011028flt93mainstoryp7.asp
    http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,212800,00.html
    http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,34211,00.html
    http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/binladen/who/interview.html
    http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB196/index.htm
    http://cryptome.sabotage.org/wtc-house.htm
    http://www.nytimes.com/packages/html/nyregion/20050812_WTC_GRAPHIC/Banaciski_Richard.txt
    http://www.icivilengineer.com/News/WTC/Fire.html
    http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&node=&contentId=A13766-2001Sep11
    http://enr.construction.com/news/buildings/archives/030127.asp
    http://www.navytimes.com/story.php?f=1-292925-467181.php
    http://news.uns.purdue.edu/html4ever/020910.Sozen.Pentagon.html
    http://www.newhousenews.com/archive/story1a012802.html
    http://web.archive.org/web/20040225213523/http://www.newsday.com/news/nationworld/nation/ny-usflight232380680sep23.story
    http://www.metallurgy.nist.gov/techactv2005/ar2005_safety.html#fire
    http://www.911myths.com/html/ntsb_release_august_22_2006.html
    http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/terrorism/jan-june02/towers_5-1.html
    http://edition.cnn.com/2006/US/11/02/wtc.remains.reut/index.html
    http://web.archive.org/web/20031026101720/http://www.arabianews.org/english/article.cfm?qid=12&sid=6
    http://www.september11news.com/OsamaEvidence.htm
    http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/nr/2001/skyscrapers.pdf
    http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&contentId=A19549-2001Sep24
    http://www.ratical.org/ratville/CAH/M.A.Sweeney.html
    http://www.guardian.co.uk/wtccrash/story/0%2C1300%2C550486%2C00.html
    http://criticalthrash.com/terror.html
    http://fire.nist.gov/bfrlpubs/build03/PDF/b03017.pdf
    http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2001/11/28/60II/main319383.shtml

  8. Its a conspiracy theory. Anyone who thinks that the United States would attack itself has let paranoia run amok. Read the 9-11 report. Get your head out of your ass.

  9. My understanding is that all the “evidence” used to imply conspiracy were bits and pieces taken out of context and misconstrued. The worst example of this is the quote by a witness that the plane “looked like a missile” — this quote was taken out of context where the witness clearly identified it as a commercial plane but described it metaphorically and is now DEVASTATED that his own words have been twisted around.

    In the 9/11 attack, the first person to realize that the buildings were at risk of collapsing was the engineer who was inside and died there, after radioing back his warning.

    Even if anyone planned in advance to “blow up the buildings using separate bombs,” the chances and ability to make the planes strike at the exact time and location are near impossible.

    To me, the tellling sign is the “spirit” of how the facts are presented. When the author of the book dispelling myths about 9/11 spoke on the air, his intent was clearly to establish truth and not to be hateful or ugly toward anyone who believed otherwise; infact, he expressed nothing but compassion and willlingness to listen and share dialogue with those he understood were misled by others. On the other hand, the people who keep pushing conspiracy theories have a negative bias against others trying to correct or counteract using facts. And there seems to be the influence of third parties, with no interest in reconciliation, but who perhaps get a thrill out of instigating public panic and conflict while conveniently remaining anonymous and not taking responsibility for their viewpoints. I find all this very cruel.

    The real underlying conspiracy is the false system of economic and political competition that keeps groups divided and oppressed for the benefit of those who profit from conflict and dependence. As long as people continue to feel like “powerless victims” to “corporations” in control, made worse by conspiracy theories, abuses continue to go unchecked because attention and resources are diverted from real solutions based on cooperative effort, which is undermined by instigating division. This includes the mainstream media, where money is made off ratings from controversial conflict and there is little interest in promoting agreement and reconciliation. Thus, both sides of any issue are painted in the worst most divisive light in order to foment public reaction.

    As long as resources, time, energy, and thought are wasted fighting and competing politically for power — that was the driving force that allowed 9/11 to happen. No one is guiltless if you want to point to the real conspiracy.

We have been told about the conspiracy, when do people get angry and act to change the continuing evil?

it’s been hyped up to be “just a conspiracy” but more and more concrete evidence is proving that 9/11 was done by our own gov’t and for the greed our administrators have for oil, the most valuable resource on the planet. everyday new light is shed on the subject, yet I rarely hear of anything being done to confront the issue on a level that will right all the wrongs that have been done. why? this is america, land of the free, why can we not take back our own land and restore it to the values it was founded upon?