2 Responses

1. I know how it works, each person has their own way of explaining it. Some folks dont understand how you can get extra energy out of a chemical situation. I explain it like this. If a guy goes down a mine, to get coal to burn, and uses less energy getting the coal, than the electricity company gets from burning it, are you surprised ? No ! The Stan Meyer discovery is the equivalent at the atomic level. He cracks the hydrogen-oxygen bond in a none chemical way.
   Stan Meyer made a presentation to 100 top scientists and guys like admirals in the uk. The Admirals in the Navy said… we are nuts not taking this up…….. our ships are floating on their fuel supply ! I have seen a video of the converted car, and airplane. The type of plane is secret, and I promised not to tell. Please tell if you find video… I would expect it to get pulled tho, only lies about Stan are allowed to stay on the net.
   The patent, one of 22, uses the phrase ‘skilled in the art’ to describe the voltages and frequencies used. However the real secret is the back off circuit Stan devised, that cuts in after the initial higher voltage strikes, to get the process rolling. It takes three voltage reversals as well, It is not a D.C. design. Good luck in your search.

2. I’m sorry to say that from all evidence Mr Meyer never really discovered anything new, nor did he ever give a successful demonstration. Nobody’s suppressing anything: energy works the way it works, and chemistry works the way it works. I, for one, am rather glad that water is as stable a compound as it is, for if you can dissociate water with great ease, you can do the same to people.