http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/6847227/Questions-over-business-deals-of-UN-climate-change-guru-Dr-Rajendra-Pachauri.html
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/energy/6491195/Al-Gore-could-become-worlds-first-carbon-billionaire.html
http://www.reformer.com/ci_14039486?source=most_viewed
http://www.climategate.com/global-warming-expert-prince-charles-says-we-are-all-going-to-die
17 Responses
NO.
Naaah! Just a liberal democrat gore lover!
Yes you do.
No, but it helps to be that way if you want to deny all of the scientific studies and educated opinions that exist proving it.
There where people in the 30’s that new that the Nazi’s intended to wipe out the jews. People at the time probably labeled them as conspiracy theorists.
Being a conspiracy theorist is not always a bad thing. Every time something evil is wiped out it is started by someone having a conspiracy theory.
Watch Christopher Monckton demolish this Greenpeace idiot.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OzkB5DuveDE
A conspiracy theorist is someone who tries to see a conspiracy behind everything. If you question certain things this doesn’t mean you’re a conspiracy theorist.
No. Ignorance alone is sufficient.
I believe that it is true now or has the potential to become real. Billions of tons of gases must have
their effect in addition to pollution
No but you have to be a loony toon (conspiracy theorists) to believe we never went to the moon, we caused 9/11, and that lizzard men have taken over the govts of the world.
Man made global warming is like the flat earth theory, and that the earth is the center of the universe.
At one time, it was the generally accepted consensus, and everybody said it was obviously true.
Then new scientific evidence proved it wrong, and the world changed:
http://online.wsj.com/
The Climate Science Isn’t Settled
“…articles from major modeling centers acknowledged that the failure of these models to anticipate the absence of warming for the past dozen years was due to the failure of these models to account for this natural internal variability. Thus even the basis for the weak IPCC argument for anthropogenic climate change was shown to be false.”
“Mr. Lindzen is professor of meteorology at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology”
You conspiracy nuts don’t use common sense. You think that because Al Gore or so and so is profiting from it, that makes it less real? Global warming is real, we can literally visit spots on earth where it’s already affected things. It’s not like some prediction like 2012 crap. It’s real and it’s already happening and in effect. Of course there will be people profiting from it, there was people who profited from Hurricane Katrina, and people are still profiting from the 2004 Tsunami. That doesn’t make the events less real. It just means that some people will take advantage of a bad situation.
Power point presentations perpetrated by Algor the American gladiator.
The UN has made this a conspiracy by rejecting all science that is outside the IPCC. That is the first indicator that this is bad science.
yes, pretty much
Or maybe you don’t have a concept of what science is or how it works
or you just fully believe right wing propaganda – the zombies
For hundreds of scientists in dozens of agencies to have a motivation to all create a scam or hoax is possible, but a bizarre idea, is it not? Nature has a perfect thermometer, accurate to 0.001 degrees – it’s called the ice melting point. Science can never guarantee truth, but it gets pretty darn reliable. And when its wrong, it doesn’t try to cling to discounted theories.
no.