The world needs a new source of energy, an unspillable source.

Random Post

(may be broke/outdated!)

6 Responses

  1. Well … it’s not just the governments report but the independent reports from agencies that have no ties to the government at all.
    That I believe; the many reports that came from more than one official agency all reporting the same thing.

  2. I don’t believe the government about anything, but their story about 9-11 seems to be verified from non-government sources.

  3. Actually OBL denied it almost immediately,BTW he was an CIA asset for years, he was even treated in an America a hospital in the Persian Gulf in July 2001, it was even reported in the mainstream ‘Guardian’ Newspaper in Britain.

    There is massive gas reserves in the Caspian Sea basin . There is a trans -Caspian gas pipeline across Afghanistan which would be vital for selling it to the emerging markets of India and China. The President of Afghanistan is even a former employee of Cheney in Unocal

    The WTC was targeted because it was a expensive to run complex of a white elephant of asbestos mounds. It was wanted rid of – the speed of collapse was impossible for a pancake collapse – the official explanation. But NO STEEL STRUCTURE BUILDING HAS EVER COLLAPSE DUE TO FIRE.

    The damage recorded at the Pentagon totally inconsistent with a Boeing 757 impact and just about anybody with a basic grasp would know that such a craft would have broken up had it been flown as the official account claims .

    You see, what appears to be ‘likely’ to somebody doesn’t figure. what does is the discounting of that which is impossible. If even ONE of the of technical explanations is impossible, then the whole account is invalid. In this case BOTH explanations are impossible both for the WTC AND the Pentagon incidents.

    The prime reason I suggest that you (and others) have chosen to believe the official account is that it gives you more comfort. . If you use poor research then expect poor conclusions and you obviously have.

    The true perps for 9/11 are still in power largely hidden behind the puppet political “leadership” and the mass of the population who seek comfort in denial . But denial is not a defense . Everybody has a moral duty to seek out truth.
    The future of humanity is at stake if you get it wrong . The culprits are not messing around and they can’t afford to lose either. They will work night and day to feed yours and others denial. That suits them just dandy!

    BTW just one final note , don’t think that because this happened on US soil that it is an “American Conspiracy”. What you are dealing with is a globalist conspiracy . The US citizens involved are not loyal to their country, but to the own self-appointed global elites . Likewise the same applies to, say, those behind the 7/7 false flag bombings in London or say the Mumbai attacks. None of these native elites care about the their own. That is the nature of the type of ruthless globalist elite that the world is finding itself having to deal with and their insane,tyrannical and barbaric plans. .

Do you believe the government, about what happened on 9/11/01?

Question by : Do you believe the government, about what happened on 9/11/01?
I personally do.I was a little skeptical at first, until UBL came on tv in november of ’04, admitting to it.I feel it could be very true.There are those who say it was to go to war with afghanistan, for oil.I, and anyone else with 2 cents worth of knowledge know that’s untrue, because there is no oil in afghanistan, and we wouldn’t have attacked the basis of our Armed Forces (Our financial center, and our operational center).I think if we just wanted to kill alot of people and go to war, we would have attacked the empire state building, or some other useless place.I think insurgents set the charges in WTC-7,not the CIA.Or in could have been some coladeral damage from the planes(I.E. an engine, a rudder, or some jet fuel).To the ones that say, a building wouldn’t collapse if it caught on fire, I think it would, considering the kersone burning at 1600 degrees, would go right through the iron, which melts at 1400 degrees.I think it just took so long, because it was so thick, and the rest of the building fell, because of the impact on it from the top falling.

Best answer:

Answer by tillan2k
temperature is in centigrade or Fahrenheit
in this case Govt means CIA .
in God I trust every thing is data
there is no data . , i would not trust either

Give your answer to this question below!